James Depaul Enterprises, Inc. v. Cavana

5 So. 3d 793, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2680, 2009 WL 818986
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 31, 2009·No. 1D09-0379·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellants’ response to this court’s January 28, 2009, order to show cause, Appellants’ appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Metellus v. State, 900 So.2d 491 (Fla.2005) (noting a jurisdictional rule cannot be altered by the court or by agreement of the parties); see also Buscaino v. Yarborough, 935 So.2d 635 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (dis *794 missing untimely appeal for lack of jurisdiction).

BARFIELD, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Depaul Enterprises, Inc. v. Cavana, 5 So. 3d 793, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2680, 2009 WL 818986 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

5 So. 3d 793 (James Depaul Enterprises, Inc. v. Cavana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buscaino v. Yarborough
935 So. 2d 635 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)