James Dento v. Eugene T. Urbaniak, Edward P. Feehan

Third Circuit

James Dento v. Eugene T. Urbaniak, Edward P. Feehan

287 F.2d 559, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5068

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 17, 1961·No. 13503·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court for the District of New Jersey entering judgment for the defendant for failure on the part of the plaintiff to state a set of facts on which relief could be granted. After examination of the material presented on behalf of the appellant we reach the conclusion that the district judge was right.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court for the District of New Jersey entering judgment for the defendant for failure on the part of the plaintiff to state a set of facts on which relief could be granted. After examination of the material presented on behalf of the appellant we reach the conclusion that the district judge was right.

The judgment will be affirmed.

James Dento v. Eugene T. Urbaniak, Edward P. Feehan, 287 F.2d 559, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5068 (3d Cir. 1961).

Pincite

287 F.2d 559 (James Dento v. Eugene T. Urbaniak, Edward P. Feehan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.