James Dento v. Eugene T. Urbaniak, Edward P. Feehan

Third Circuit

James Dento v. Eugene T. Urbaniak, Edward P. Feehan

287 F.2d 559, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5068

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMarch 17, 1961

Docket13503

StatusPublished

This text of 287 F.2d 559 (James Dento v. Eugene T. Urbaniak, Edward P. Feehan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Dento v. Eugene T. Urbaniak, Edward P. Feehan, 287 F.2d 559, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5068 (3d Cir. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court for the District of New Jersey entering judgment for the defendant for failure on the part of the plaintiff to state a set of facts on which relief could be granted. After examination of the material presented on behalf of the appellant we reach the conclusion that the district judge was right.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court for the District of New Jersey entering judgment for the defendant for failure on the part of the plaintiff to state a set of facts on which relief could be granted. After examination of the material presented on behalf of the appellant we reach the conclusion that the district judge was right.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 F.2d 559, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-dento-v-eugene-t-urbaniak-edward-p-feehan-ca3-1961.