James David Helmuth v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

James David Helmuth v. State

DecidedApril 8, 2009

Docket12-09-00106-CR

StatusPublished

This text of James David Helmuth v. State (James David Helmuth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James David Helmuth v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JAMES DAVID HELMUTH, § APPEAL FROM THE 241ST APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM James David Helmuth pleaded guilty to continuing sexual abuse of a child, and the jury assessed punishment at thirty-five years. He now attempts to appeal his conviction. We have received the trial court’s certification showing that Appellant waived his right to appeal. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). The certification is signed by the trial court, Appellant, and Appellant’s counsel. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Opinion delivered April 8, 2009. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JAMES DAVID HELMUTH, § APPEAL FROM THE 241ST APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM James David Helmuth pleaded guilty to continuing sexual abuse of a child, and the jury assessed punishment at thirty-five years. He now attempts to appeal his conviction. We have received the trial court’s certification showing that Appellant waived his right to appeal. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). The certification is signed by the trial court, Appellant, and Appellant’s counsel. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Opinion delivered April 8, 2009. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

James David Helmuth v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-david-helmuth-v-state-texapp-2009.