James Darryl Allen v. Gail Lewis, Warden

295 F.3d 1046, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 7860, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6267, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 14139, 2002 WL 1493326
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 15, 2002·No. 01-15503·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The district court held that Allen’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 was filed sixteen days after the AEDPA one-year statute of limitations had expired. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). After the panel opinion affirmed the district court, we decided Bunney v. Mitchell, 262 F.3d 973 (9th Cir.2001), where we held that the California Supreme Court’s denial of a petition for collateral relief does not become final until thirty days after the denial is issued. Id. at 974 (citing Rule 24 of the California Rules of Court). We so held after the California Supreme Court had declined to answer our certified question on this point. Id. (citing Bunney v. Mitchell, 249 F.3d 1188, 1188-89 (9th Cir.2001)). Under Bunney, which we now reaffirm, the petition in this case was timely. The judgment of the district court is therefore REVERSED and the matter REMANDED for consideration of the petition for habeas corpus.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Darryl Allen v. Gail Lewis, Warden, 295 F.3d 1046, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 7860, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6267, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 14139, 2002 WL 1493326 (9th Cir. 2002).

295 F.3d 1046 (James Darryl Allen v. Gail Lewis, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frank Trudeau v. D. Runnels
414 F. App'x 42 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Sergei Korolev v. Robert Horel
386 F. App'x 594 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Phelps v. Alameida
569 F.3d 1120 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Whitfield v. Pliler
56 F. App'x 830 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Charles Roger Jorss v. James H. Gomez, Director
311 F.3d 1189 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)