James Daniel Morgan v. United States
340 F.2d 125, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6968
This text of 340 F.2d 125 (James Daniel Morgan v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
James Daniel Morgan v. United States, 340 F.2d 125, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6968 (9th Cir. 1965).
Opinion
Appellant’s sole contention on this appeal is that the heroin which was received in evidence should have been excluded on the ground that it is a product of an illegal search and seizure. We hold to the contrary. See Blackford v. U. S., 247 F.2d 745 (9th Cir. 1957) C.D., 356 U.S. 914, 78 S.Ct. 672, 2 L.Ed.2d 586.
The Judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Charles E. Blackford v. United States
247 F.2d 745 (Ninth Circuit, 1957)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
340 F.2d 125, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-daniel-morgan-v-united-states-ca9-1965.