James Daniel Morgan v. United States

340 F.2d 125, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6968

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s sole contention on this appeal is that the heroin which was received in evidence should have been excluded on the ground that it is a product of an illegal search and seizure. We hold to the contrary. See Blackford v. U. S., 247 F.2d 745 (9th Cir. 1957) C.D., 356 U.S. 914, 78 S.Ct. 672, 2 L.Ed.2d 586.

The Judgment of conviction is affirmed.