James Daly v. City of DeSoto, MO

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
• Decided: June 27, 2024
• Docket: 23-3223
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 23-3223 ___________________________

James A. Daly

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

City of DeSoto, Missouri; Jeff McCreary

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________

Submitted: June 24, 2024 Filed: June 27, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

James Daly appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment on his claims against his former employer, the City of DeSoto (the City),

1 The Honorable John A. Ross, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. alleging that he was retaliated against during his time as a sergeant with the City’s police department, which ultimately culminated in his termination. Upon careful review, we conclude that summary judgment was proper. See Henry v. Johnson, 950 F.3d 1005, 1010 (8th Cir. 2020) (standard of review). As to the state-law retaliation claim, we agree with the district court that “the record lacks any instance or accumulation of events targeting Daly that a reasonable person objectively would consider so abusive or severe as to constitute an actionable hostile work environment.” See Watson v. Heartland Health Labs., Inc., 790 F.3d 856, 864 (8th Cir. 2015); Thorn v. Amalgamated Transit Union, 305 F.3d 826, 831 (8th Cir. 2002). As to the First Amendment retaliation claim, we agree with the district court that Daly’s termination was justified under the balancing test set out in Pickering v. Bd. of Educ., 391 U.S. 563 (1968), particularly as the City provided sufficient evidence that Daly’s speech disrupted the City’s operations. See Noon v. City of Platte Woods, 94 F.4th 759, 764 (8th Cir. 2024); Henry, 950 F.3d at 1012; Anzaldua v. Northeast Ambulance & Fire Prot. Dist., 793 F.3d 822, 835 (8th Cir. 2015). To the extent Daly also raised these claims against the chief of police in his official capacity, we conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing such claims as redundant. See King v. City of Crestwood, 899 F.3d 643, 650 (8th Cir. 2018); Rumery v. Outboard Marine Corp., 172 F.3d 531, 535 (8th Cir. 1999).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

-2-