James Daggs v. FCA US LLC

Opinion

O 1

2 3 4 5 6 7

8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California

11 JAMES DAGGS et al., Case № 2:20-cv-03867-ODW (JEMx) 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 13 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN 14 v. AMENDED COMPLAINT [24]

15 FCA US LLC, et al., 16 17 Defendants.

18 19 On October 5, 2020, Plaintiffs James Daggs and Rhonda Daggs moved for 20 leave to file an Amended Complaint (“Motion”), proposing to add counts and 21 allegations against existing Defendant FCA US LLC for a claim under the 22 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. (Mot., ECF No. 24.) Plaintiffs set the Motion to be 23 heard on November 2, 2020, and thus any opposition was due no later than October 24 12, 2020. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-9. To date, Defendant has filed no opposition. The 25 failure to file a timely opposition may be deemed consent to the granting of a motion. 26 C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-12; Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 54 (9th Cir. 1995). 27 After carefully considering the moving papers, the Court deems the matter 28 appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. 1 || L.R. 7-15. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the hearing on November 2, 2020. 2 || The Court finds Plaintiffs have shown good cause to amend the complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2) and Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178 (1962). In light of Defendant’s 4|| failure to oppose and Plaintiffs’ showing of good cause, the Court GRANTS 5] Plaintiffs Motion. The Court ORDERS Plaintiffs to file and serve the First 6 || Amended Complaint no later than October 30, 2020. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 15-1. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 October 27, 2020 11 . “

OTIS D. WRIGHT, II 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28