James D. Redford v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company
This text of James D. Redford v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company (James D. Redford v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-05-00049-CV
James D. REDFORD,
Appellant
v.
TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Appellee
From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2004-CI-13274
Honorable Michael P. Peden, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 15, 2005
DISMISSED
James D. Redford appeals the trial court’s judgment signed December 27, 2004. Redford’s appellant’s brief was due April 28, 2005. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time were filed. On May 11, 2005, we therefore ordered Redford to file, on or before May 26, 2005, his appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining his failure to timely file the brief and showing why appellee is not significantly injured by Redford’s failure to timely file a brief. We further advised Redford that if he failed to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a). Redford has not filed a brief or the written response ordered by the court.
We therefore order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. We further order that no costs shall be assessed against appellant because he is indigent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James D. Redford v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-d-redford-v-texas-mutual-insurance-company-texapp-2005.