James D. Ford v. Sec, DOC
Opinion
[PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 09-14820 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUGUST 18, 2010
Non-Argument Calendar
JOHN LEY
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 07-00333-CV-UA-SPC JAMES D. FORD,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondents-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida
(August 18, 2010)
ON REMAND FROM THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, EDMONDSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
This appeal is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. See Ford v.
McNeil, __ S. Ct. __, No. 09-7493 (June 21, 2010). This Court denied in an unpublished order James D. Ford’s application for a certificate of appealability about the issue whether Ford is entitled to equitable tolling of the one-year limitations period in the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). The Supreme Court vacated that order and remanded to this Court for further consideration in the light of Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. __, 130 S. Ct. 2549 (2010). We now remand to the district court for the limited purpose of conducting further proceedings and fact-finding—including, if necessary, an evidentiary hearing—consistent with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court in Holland.
LIMITED REMAND.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James D. Ford v. Sec, DOC (James D. Ford v. Sec, DOC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.