James D. Cunningham v. Oak Street Development, Inc.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,__________________ February 06, 2013
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A13A0658, A13A0659. CUNNINGHAM v. OAK STREET DEVELOPMENT, INC. et al.
On January 9, 2013, the above-styled appeals were “dismissed as moot” by this Court. This was a clerical error, because the order should have stated that the appeals were “dismissed.”
Accordingly, the January 9, 2013 order of this Court is VACATED.
For the same reasons given in that order, however, the above-styled appeals are hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 02/06/2013 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James D. Cunningham v. Oak Street Development, Inc. (James D. Cunningham v. Oak Street Development, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.