James D Cheyne v. Mileena Boles
This text of James D Cheyne v. Mileena Boles (James D Cheyne v. Mileena Boles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
January 22, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
159838 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra JAMES D. CHEYNE, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellee, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 159838 COA: 343495 Allegan CC: 16-056143-NI MILEENA BOLES and JALAL BOLES, Defendants-Appellants, and AUTO CLUB INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 14, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
BERNSTEIN, J., did not participate because he has a family member with an interest that could be affected by the proceeding.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 22, 2020 a0115 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James D Cheyne v. Mileena Boles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-d-cheyne-v-mileena-boles-mich-2020.