James D Cheyne v. Mileena Boles

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 22, 2020·No. 159838·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

January 22, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

159838 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

JAMES D. CHEYNE, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellee, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

v SC: 159838 COA: 343495 Allegan CC: 16-056143-NI

MILEENA BOLES and JALAL BOLES, Defendants-Appellants,

and AUTO CLUB INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 14, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

BERNSTEIN, J., did not participate because he has a family member with an interest that could be affected by the proceeding.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 22, 2020

a0115

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James D Cheyne v. Mileena Boles, (Mich. 2020).

James D Cheyne v. Mileena Boles (James D Cheyne v. Mileena Boles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.