James Curtis Robinson v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

James Curtis Robinson v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

37 F.3d 1495, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34878, 1994 WL 556883

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 12, 1994

Docket93-6019

StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1495 (James Curtis Robinson v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Curtis Robinson v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, 37 F.3d 1495, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34878, 1994 WL 556883 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

37 F.3d 1495
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James Curtis ROBINSON, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director of the Virginia Department of
Corrections, Respondent Appellee.

No. 93-6019.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 5, 1994.
Decided Oct. 12, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-92-505-2)

James Curtis Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.

Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Murray, No. CA-92-505-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 21, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

37 F.3d 1495
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James Curtis ROBINSON, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director of the Virginia Department of
Corrections, Respondent Appellee.

No. 93-6019.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 5, 1994.
Decided Oct. 12, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-92-505-2)

James Curtis Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.

Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Murray, No. CA-92-505-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 21, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 F.3d 1495, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34878, 1994 WL 556883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-curtis-robinson-v-edward-w-murray-director-o-ca4-1994.