James Crofton v. Attorney Grievance Commission
This text of James Crofton v. Attorney Grievance Commission (James Crofton v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
June 24, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman 148682 Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, JAMES CROFTON, Justices Plaintiff, v SC: 148682 AGC: 1786-13 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 24, 2014 s0616 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James Crofton v. Attorney Grievance Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-crofton-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2014.