James Constant v. The United States

Federal Circuit

James Constant v. The United States

884 F.2d 1398, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 11941, 1989 WL 90244

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedAugust 14, 1989

Docket89-1429

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 884 F.2d 1398 (James Constant v. The United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Constant v. The United States, 884 F.2d 1398, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 11941, 1989 WL 90244 (Fed. Cir. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

884 F.2d 1398

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
James CONSTANT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89-1429.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 14, 1989.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge, and MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

DECISION

James Constant appeals from a decision of the United States Claims Court, which granted the government's cross-motion for summary judgment; denied Constant's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. We affirm the decision on the basis of Judge Lydon's opinion, 16 Cl.Ct. 629 (1989).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI