James Comis v. Trader Horn Appliance Stores, Inc.

430 F.2d 1183, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6928
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedOctober 14, 1970
Docket18496_1
StatusPublished

This text of 430 F.2d 1183 (James Comis v. Trader Horn Appliance Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Comis v. Trader Horn Appliance Stores, Inc., 430 F.2d 1183, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6928 (3d Cir. 1970).

Opinion

430 F.2d 1183

James COMIS
v.
TRADER HORN APPLIANCE STORES, INC., and Charles Tanner,
Trader Horn Appliance Stores, Inc., Appellant in
No. 18,495, Charles Tanner, Appellant in
No. 18,496.

Nos. 18495, 18496.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued Sept. 25, 1970.
Decided Oct. 14, 1970.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; Lawrence A. Whipple, Judge.

James S. Cramer, Lamb, Blake, Hutchinson & Dunne, Jersey City, N.J., for appellants.

Lawrence E. Florio, Florio, Dunn, Marciano & Lypinski, Hoboken, N.J., for appellee.

Before KALODNER, FREEDMAN and ADAMS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $15,000.00 in his personal injury action, and against the defendants on their counterclaim. Defendants have appealed the Judgment entered by the District Court pursuant to the jury's verdict in favor of the plaintiff in his action and on the defendants' counterclaim.

Defendants here contend that the jury's verdict in favor of the plaintiff was 'clearly against the weight of the evidence' and that it was 'a compromise verdict.' They further urge that the trial court erred in not holding that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

On review of the record, and consideration of the parties' briefs and oral argument, we cannot subscribe to the defendants' contentions.

The Judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
430 F.2d 1183, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-comis-v-trader-horn-appliance-stores-inc-ca3-1970.