James Clifford v. Carla Walker

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2024
Docket23-2857
StatusUnpublished

This text of James Clifford v. Carla Walker (James Clifford v. Carla Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Clifford v. Carla Walker, (8th Cir. 2024).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 23-2857 ___________________________

James E. Clifford

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Carla Walker, Property Manager; Yarco Company, Inc.; St. Michael Housing Partners Investors I, L.P.

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________

Submitted: February 20, 2024 Filed: February 23, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, BENTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Juges. ____________

PER CURIAM. Missouri resident James Clifford appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment on his federal housing discrimination and retaliation claims. On appeal, he refers to claims that were omitted from the operative complaint or voluntarily dismissed, and he challenges the summary judgment decision.

After careful review, we conclude the claims omitted from the operative complaint were abandoned, see In re Atlas Van Lines, Inc., 209 F.3d 1064, 1067 (8th Cir. 2000) (amended complaint supersedes original complaint); and Clifford may not seek review of the claims he voluntarily dismissed, see Bowers v. St. Louis Sw. Ry. Co., 668 F.3d 369, 369 (8th Cir. 1981) (per curiam) (plaintiff generally may not appeal from order granting voluntarily dismissal). We further conclude the adverse grant of summary judgment was proper for the reasons explained by the district court. See Gallagher v. Magner, 619 F.3d 823, 830 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of grant of summary judgment, viewing evidence in light most favorable to non-movant).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Clifford’s motion to supplement the record. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James Clifford v. Carla Walker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-clifford-v-carla-walker-ca8-2024.