James Clay Martin, Jr. v. United States

447 F.2d 985, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8219
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 3, 1971
Docket71-1935
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 447 F.2d 985 (James Clay Martin, Jr. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Clay Martin, Jr. v. United States, 447 F.2d 985, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8219 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is taken from an order of. the district court denying the motion of a federal prisoner to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 1

The court denied appellant’s motions for a trial transcript and for § 2255 relief. There was a contested issue of fact as to whether law enforcement officers who appeared in a lineup with appellant, in which lineup appellant was identified by a witness, were known to the witness to be law enforcement officers and thus not persons suspected of the crime involved, with the result that the lineup was tainted. The trial court decided this contested issue on the basis of affidavits, which it may not do. Pike v. United States, 409 F.2d 499, 501 (5th Cir. 1969); Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487, 494, 82 S.Ct. 510, 7 L.Ed.2d 473, 478 (1963).

Vacated and remanded.

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paul Braxton Owens v. United States
551 F.2d 1053 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)
Richard Montgomery v. United States
469 F.2d 148 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
447 F.2d 985, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-clay-martin-jr-v-united-states-ca5-1971.