James Chang v. Merit Systems Protection Board, and United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
677 F.2d 173, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19374, 35 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1289
Opinion
We conclude, in agreement with the decisions in Wiggins v. United States Postal Service, 653 F.2d 219 (5th Cir. 1981) and Christo v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 667 F.2d 882 (10th Cir. 1981), that mixed cases involving both claims of discrimination and of improper agency action must be brought as one action in the district court. Accordingly we lack jurisdiction over the petition and it is therefore dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James Chang v. Merit Systems Protection Board, and United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, 677 F.2d 173, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19374, 35 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1289 (1st Cir. 1982).
677 F.2d 173 (James Chang v. Merit Systems Protection Board, and United States Immigration and Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. Frank
702 F. Supp. 14 (D. Massachusetts, 1988)
Andrew L. Tolliver v. James Deniro, Director of Veterans Administration Medical Center, Palo Alto, California
790 F.2d 1394 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Perry E. DOYAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John O. MARSH, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the Army, Defendant-Appellee
777 F.2d 1526 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
Miller v. Department of the Air Force
654 F. Supp. 186 (D. Massachusetts, 1985)
James Chang v. William French Smith
778 F.2d 83 (First Circuit, 1985)
Chang v. Smith
103 F.R.D. 401 (D. Puerto Rico, 1984)
Joseph F. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, Respondent
715 F.2d 1485 (Federal Circuit, 1983)
Edward R. Vauls v. Veterans Administration, Merit Systems Protection Board, and United States of America
693 F.2d 232 (D.C. Circuit, 1982)
Lloyd J. Hayes v. United States Government Printing Office
684 F.2d 137 (D.C. Circuit, 1982)