James Castle v. United States
This text of 202 F.2d 214 (James Castle v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
202 F.2d 214
92 U.S.App.D.C. 396
James CASTLE, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 11400.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Jan. 7, 1953.
Decided Jan. 22, 1953.
DeLong Harris, Washington, D.C., with whom Curtis P. Mitchell and B. Dabney Fox, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellant.
William E. Kirk, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Charles M. Irelan, U.S. Atty., Joseph M. Howard and Emory W. Reisinger, II, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.
Before WILBUR K. MILLER, BAZELON and FAHY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Since we find no prejudicial error in the record on this appeal from a conviction for bribery under 22 D.C.Code, 701 (1951), the judgment below is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 F.2d 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-castle-v-united-states-cadc-1953.