James Carrell v. Lauri Sutton
This text of James Carrell v. Lauri Sutton (James Carrell v. Lauri Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued October 15, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00666-CV ——————————— JAMES CARRELL, Appellant V. LAURI SUTTON, Appellee
On Appeal from the 309th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2021-09932
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant James Carrell filed a “Notice of Nonsuit” representing he “no
longer desires to prosecute this appeal against Appellee [Lauri Sutton], and Appellee
has no pleading on file seeking affirmative relief from [him].” We construe
Appellant’s Notice of Nonsuit as a motion to dismiss the appeal. Although Appellant’s motion does not include a certificate of conference
stating he conferred or made a reasonable attempt to confer with Appellee regarding
the relief requested, more than ten days have passed, and Appellee has not expressed
opposition to Appellant’s motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a). No cross
appeal has been filed and no opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c).
We grant Appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). All other pending motions are denied as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Rivas-Molloy.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James Carrell v. Lauri Sutton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-carrell-v-lauri-sutton-texapp-2024.