James Carl Saal v. United States

441 F.2d 272, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10620
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 21, 1971
Docket71-1138_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 441 F.2d 272 (James Carl Saal v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Carl Saal v. United States, 441 F.2d 272, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10620 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Saal, while an inmate of the United States Penitentiary at Atlanta, Georgia, filed a petition in the district court challenging the Bureau of Prisons’s computation of the time remaining to be served on his sentence, and seeking credit thereon. The district court denied relief, and Saal appealed to this Court. *273 Thereafter an affidavit by the Administrative Assistant of the Atlanta Penitentiary was filed in this Court certifying that the appellant was unconditionally released from federal custody on February 2, 1971. Since Saal is no longer incarcerated, nor under mandatory release, 1 the issues presented upon this appeal are moot. 2

Appeal dismissed.

1

. 18 U.S.C. § 4164.

2

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Patten
366 N.W.2d 459 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
441 F.2d 272, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-carl-saal-v-united-states-ca5-1971.