James Carl Saal v. United States

441 F.2d 272, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10620
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 21, 1971·No. 71-1138_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Saal, while an inmate of the United States Penitentiary at Atlanta, Georgia, filed a petition in the district court challenging the Bureau of Prisons’s computation of the time remaining to be served on his sentence, and seeking credit thereon. The district court denied relief, and Saal appealed to this Court. *273 Thereafter an affidavit by the Administrative Assistant of the Atlanta Penitentiary was filed in this Court certifying that the appellant was unconditionally released from federal custody on February 2, 1971. Since Saal is no longer incarcerated, nor under mandatory release, 1 the issues presented upon this appeal are moot. 2

Appeal dismissed.

1

. 18 U.S.C. § 4164.

2

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Carl Saal v. United States, 441 F.2d 272, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10620 (5th Cir. 1971).

441 F.2d 272 (James Carl Saal v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Patten
366 N.W.2d 459 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1985)