James Campbell v. United States
This text of 396 F.2d 1 (James Campbell v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted for failure to obey an order of his local selective service board to report for civilian work in lieu of induction into the armed forces of the United States. Although appellant took no administrative appeal from the board’s decision, he urges that the draft board procedure denied him certain constitutional rights, including the right to counsel, right against self-incrimination, and right to confrontation of witnesses. We affirm because “all of appellant’s contentions are foreclosed by his failure to exhaust administrative remedies.” DuVernay v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 394 F.2d 979. Appellant’s final assertion, that the government failed to prove that he was called to civilian service in proper sequence, is foreclosed by our recent decisions in Pigue v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 389 F.2d 765; Lowe v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 389 F.2d 51; Greer v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 378 F.2d 931.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
396 F.2d 1, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-campbell-v-united-states-ca5-1968.