James C. Sapienza, Incorporated v. Milmoe

Supreme Court of New Jersey

James C. Sapienza, Incorporated v. Milmoe

163 A. 662, 110 N.J.L. 12, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 400

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 5, 1933·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 135.

For affirmance — -The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 135.

For affirmance — -The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

James C. Sapienza, Incorporated v. Milmoe, 163 A. 662, 110 N.J.L. 12, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 400 (N.J. 1933).

Pincite

163 A. 662 (James C. Sapienza, Incorporated v. Milmoe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.