James C. Rollings D/B/A Jake's Equipment & Repair v. Big Country Rig & Equipment PAMCO, Inc. Tom Potter, Sr. Tom Potter, Jr. Roy Foster And Patman Brothers Drilling, L.P.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 13, 2007
Docket04-07-00211-CV
StatusPublished

This text of James C. Rollings D/B/A Jake's Equipment & Repair v. Big Country Rig & Equipment PAMCO, Inc. Tom Potter, Sr. Tom Potter, Jr. Roy Foster And Patman Brothers Drilling, L.P. (James C. Rollings D/B/A Jake's Equipment & Repair v. Big Country Rig & Equipment PAMCO, Inc. Tom Potter, Sr. Tom Potter, Jr. Roy Foster And Patman Brothers Drilling, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James C. Rollings D/B/A Jake's Equipment & Repair v. Big Country Rig & Equipment PAMCO, Inc. Tom Potter, Sr. Tom Potter, Jr. Roy Foster And Patman Brothers Drilling, L.P., (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION



No. 04-07-00211-CV


James C. ROLLINGS d/b/a Jake's Equipment & Repair,

Appellant



v.



BIG COUNTRY RIG & EQUIPMENT;

PAMCO, Inc.; Tom Potter, Sr.; Tom Potter, Jr.;

Roy Foster; and Patman Brothers Drilling, L.P.

Appellees



From the 229th Judicial District Court, Jim Hogg County, Texas

Trial Court No. CC-06-129

Honorable Alex W. Gabert, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice



Delivered and Filed: June 13, 2007



DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION



Appellant seeks to appeal several orders signed by the trial court on January 22, 2007, including an order granting intervenor, Patman Brothers Drilling, L.P.'s motion for partial summary judgment. It appeared that the judgment is interlocutory because it does not dispose of appellant's claims against the defendants or any remaining claims by or against the intervenor, and no severance order appears in the record; accordingly, this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. An order or judgment is final when it disposes of all claims asserted by and against all parties. Martinez v. Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc., 875 S.W.2d 311, 312 (Tex. 1994); New York Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Sanchez, 799 S.W.2d 677, 678-79 (Tex. 1990). No response has been filed. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).





Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New York Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Sanchez
799 S.W.2d 677 (Texas Supreme Court, 1990)
Martinez v. Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc.
875 S.W.2d 311 (Texas Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James C. Rollings D/B/A Jake's Equipment & Repair v. Big Country Rig & Equipment PAMCO, Inc. Tom Potter, Sr. Tom Potter, Jr. Roy Foster And Patman Brothers Drilling, L.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-c-rollings-dba-jakes-equipment-repair-v-big-country-rig-texapp-2007.