James C. Musselman v. Clyde Breeden

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 24, 2003
Docket13-02-00692-CV
StatusPublished

This text of James C. Musselman v. Clyde Breeden (James C. Musselman v. Clyde Breeden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James C. Musselman v. Clyde Breeden, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-02-692-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________________

JAMES C. MUSSELMAN , Appellant,

v.



CLYDE BREEDEN, ET AL. , Appellees.

_______________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 139th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, JAMES C. MUSSELMAN , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-2712-99-C . After the record was filed, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellant states that this case has been settled in its entirety. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 24th day of July, 2003 .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James C. Musselman v. Clyde Breeden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-c-musselman-v-clyde-breeden-texapp-2003.