James C. Musselman v. Clyde Breeden
This text of James C. Musselman v. Clyde Breeden (James C. Musselman v. Clyde Breeden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-02-692-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
________________________________________________________________
JAMES C. MUSSELMAN , Appellant,
v.
CLYDE BREEDEN, ET AL. , Appellees.
_______________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 139th District Court
of Hidalgo County, Texas.
________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza
Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, JAMES C. MUSSELMAN , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-2712-99-C . After the record was filed, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellant states that this case has been settled in its entirety. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Opinion delivered and filed this
the 24th day of July, 2003 .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James C. Musselman v. Clyde Breeden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-c-musselman-v-clyde-breeden-texapp-2003.