James Byrd Miller v. Joseph L. Hamilton Charles M. Creecy Harry L. Allbrooks Larry E. Davis James W. Cook Mrs. Thompson Doctor Stanley

Fourth Circuit

James Byrd Miller v. Joseph L. Hamilton Charles M. Creecy Harry L. Allbrooks Larry E. Davis James W. Cook Mrs. Thompson Doctor Stanley

25 F.3d 1040, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20823, 1994 WL 259244

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 7, 1994·No. 93-7023·Published

Opinion

25 F.3d 1040
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James Byrd MILLER, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Joseph L. HAMILTON; Charles M. Creecy; Harry L. Allbrooks;
Larry E. Davis; James W. Cook; Mrs. Thompson;
Doctor Stanley, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7023.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 24, 1994.
Decided June 7, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-90-521-CRT-D).

James Byrd Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Ass't Atty. Gen., Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. Hamilton, No. CA-90-521-CRT-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 25, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

25 F.3d 1040
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James Byrd MILLER, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Joseph L. HAMILTON; Charles M. Creecy; Harry L. Allbrooks;
Larry E. Davis; James W. Cook; Mrs. Thompson;
Doctor Stanley, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7023.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 24, 1994.
Decided June 7, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-90-521-CRT-D).

James Byrd Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Ass't Atty. Gen., Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. Hamilton, No. CA-90-521-CRT-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 25, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel.

AFFIRMED

James Byrd Miller v. Joseph L. Hamilton Charles M. Creecy Harry L. Allbrooks Larry E. Davis James W. Cook Mrs. Thompson Doctor Stanley, 25 F.3d 1040, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20823, 1994 WL 259244 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

25 F.3d 1040 (James Byrd Miller v. Joseph L. Hamilton Charles M. Creecy Harry L. Allbrooks Larry E. Davis James W. Cook Mrs. Thompson Doctor Stanley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.