James Bush v. United States
This text of 393 F.2d 478 (James Bush v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order of the district court denying appellant’s relief on his collateral attack *479 on his judgment of conviction is affirmed.
He asserts his lawyer did not interview and call certain witnesses that would have aided his case. The trouble is that on his own statement there was nothing material to the event that was actually the crime which the witnesses could have proved. There is no suggestion they were present at the pertinent time. They might have shown some prior noncriminal business negotiations between themselves and Bush which would be immaterial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
393 F.2d 478, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-bush-v-united-states-ca9-1968.