James Bruyn v. Kevin Swearingen

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 31, 2019
Docket09-18-00476-CV
StatusPublished

This text of James Bruyn v. Kevin Swearingen (James Bruyn v. Kevin Swearingen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Bruyn v. Kevin Swearingen, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-18-00476-CV ________________

JAMES BRUYN, Appellant

V.

KEVIN SWEARINGEN, Appellee __________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 136th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. D-201,991 __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

James Bruyn filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion

includes a certificate of conference signed by counsel for Swearingen. According to

the motion, the parties have agreed to allow Swearingen a thirty-day extension to

cure the deficiency in his expert’s report, and in return, Bruyn would dismiss the

appeal. No opinion has issued in this appeal. We grant Bruyn’s motion to dismiss

and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.

1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice

Submitted on January 30, 2019 Opinion Delivered January 31, 2019

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James Bruyn v. Kevin Swearingen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-bruyn-v-kevin-swearingen-texapp-2019.