James Brown, Jr. v. United States

375 F.2d 769, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6733
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 14, 1967·No. 23871_1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon careful consideration it is clear that appellant’s attack upon the judgment of guilty on the ground that the unsupported evidence of his co-defendant Adams was not sufficient to warrant submission of case to the jury cannot prevail. See Ward v. United States, 5 Cir. 1962, 296 F.2d 898.

The other point relied upon by appellant, complaining of the court’s *770 charge relative to the “admission or confession” contained in the statement voluntarily given by Brown, was not saved for our consideration by an exception made to the charge at the time of trial. We think the charge as a whole gave the defendant a fair trial and no error has been shown that would warrant our applying the plain error rule, Rule 52 F.R. Crim.P.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Brown, Jr. v. United States, 375 F.2d 769, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6733 (5th Cir. 1967).

375 F.2d 769 (James Brown, Jr. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robert F. O'Neal v. United States
411 F.2d 131 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)