James Brandon Clinton v. Raphiza Louziero
Opinion
Opinion issued February 14, 2013
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
NO. 01-12-00737-CV
JAMES BRANDON CLINTON, Appellant
V.
RAPHIZA LOUZIERO, Appellee
On Appeal from the 310th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-55986
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, James Brandon Clinton, has neither paid the required filing fee
for this appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying
costs must pay—at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order.”), 20.1 (listing requirements for
establishing indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp.
2012), § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2012) (listing fees in
court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme
Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R.
APP. P. app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). The filing fee was due on
August 27, 2012. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal,
appellant did not respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule);
42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss
any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James Brandon Clinton v. Raphiza Louziero (James Brandon Clinton v. Raphiza Louziero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.