James Bowman v. R L Coolsaet Construction Company

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 29, 2006
Docket132104
StatusPublished

This text of James Bowman v. R L Coolsaet Construction Company (James Bowman v. R L Coolsaet Construction Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Bowman v. R L Coolsaet Construction Company, (Mich. 2006).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

December 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

132104 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan JAMES B. BOWMAN, Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff, Stephen J. Markman, Justices and AUTO CLUB INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 132104 COA: 258518 WCAC: 02-000455 R.L. COOLSAET CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees, and SECOND INJURY FUND, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 8, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals to address the intervening plaintiff’s remaining arguments. The Court of Appeals erred by adopting the “traveling employee” doctrine under the circumstances of this case. Here, the employee was traveling from his worksite to his home for the time being at the time of his injury. The general rule, that injuries sustained by an employee while going to or coming from work are not compensable, is applicable even when an employee’s residence is temporary because of a particular job assignment. Graham v Somerville Construction Co, 336 Mich 359 (1953).

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. December 29, 2006 _________________________________________ t1220 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Graham v. Somerville Construction Co.
58 N.W.2d 101 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James Bowman v. R L Coolsaet Construction Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-bowman-v-r-l-coolsaet-construction-company-mich-2006.