James Bostic v. United States

D.C. Circuit

James Bostic v. United States

317 F.2d 143, 115 U.S. App. D.C. 79, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6025

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 28, 1963

Docket17439

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 317 F.2d 143 (James Bostic v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Bostic v. United States, 317 F.2d 143, 115 U.S. App. D.C. 79, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6025 (D.C. Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We remanded this case to the District Court for a hearing on the issue of appellant’s competency to stand trial. Bostic v. United States, 112 U.S.App. D.C. 17, 298 F.2d 678 (1961). See also Bostic v. United States, 68 App.D.C. 167, 94 F.2d 636 (1937), cert. denied, 303 U.S. 635, 58 S.Ct. 523, 82 L.Ed. 1095 (1938); Bostic v. Rives, 71 App.D.C. 2, 107 F.2d 649 (1939), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 664, 60 S.Ct. 593, 84 L.Ed. 1011 (1940). The District Court held a hearing, found that appellant was competent to stand trial, and denied his motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. D.C., 206 F.Supp. 855 (1962). We find no error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We remanded this case to the District Court for a hearing on the issue of appellant’s competency to stand trial. Bostic v. United States, 112 U.S.App. D.C. 17, 298 F.2d 678 (1961). See also Bostic v. United States, 68 App.D.C. 167, 94 F.2d 636 (1937), cert. denied, 303 U.S. 635, 58 S.Ct. 523, 82 L.Ed. 1095 (1938); Bostic v. Rives, 71 App.D.C. 2, 107 F.2d 649 (1939), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 664, 60 S.Ct. 593, 84 L.Ed. 1011 (1940). The District Court held a hearing, found that appellant was competent to stand trial, and denied his motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. D.C., 206 F.Supp. 855 (1962). We find no error.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

317 F.2d 143, 115 U.S. App. D.C. 79, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-bostic-v-united-states-cadc-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack