James Bostic v. United States

317 F.2d 143, 115 U.S. App. D.C. 79, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6025
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 28, 1963·No. 17439·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We remanded this case to the District Court for a hearing on the issue of appellant’s competency to stand trial. Bostic v. United States, 112 U.S.App. D.C. 17, 298 F.2d 678 (1961). See also Bostic v. United States, 68 App.D.C. 167, 94 F.2d 636 (1937), cert. denied, 303 U.S. 635, 58 S.Ct. 523, 82 L.Ed. 1095 (1938); Bostic v. Rives, 71 App.D.C. 2, 107 F.2d 649 (1939), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 664, 60 S.Ct. 593, 84 L.Ed. 1011 (1940). The District Court held a hearing, found that appellant was competent to stand trial, and denied his motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. D.C., 206 F.Supp. 855 (1962). We find no error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Bostic v. United States, 317 F.2d 143, 115 U.S. App. D.C. 79, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6025 (D.C. Cir. 1963).

317 F.2d 143 (James Bostic v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rodoussakis
511 S.E.2d 469 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1998)
Ramsey v. United States
569 A.2d 142 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1990)
Deese v. United States
303 F. Supp. 619 (D. South Carolina, 1969)
Berube v. United States
284 F. Supp. 1 (C.D. California, 1968)
Mordecai v. United States
252 F. Supp. 694 (District of Columbia, 1966)