James Blaine Gillespie v. United States

376 F.2d 414, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6624
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 25, 1967·No. 17224_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, having long since served a 1936 sentence for Dyer Act violation (18 U.S.C. § 2312), filed a motion to vacate same under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 or coram nobis.

Appellant is no longer confined as a result of the sentence he attacks, nor was it used as a predicate for his current habitual criminal sentence under which he is confined in a New York State prison. Any benefit to him from success in this-motion is most speculative.

Like the District Judge, we see no “circumstances compelling such action to achieve justice.” United States v. Morgan, 346 U.S. 502, 511, 74 S.Ct. 247, 252, 98 L.Ed. 248 (1954).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Blaine Gillespie v. United States, 376 F.2d 414, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6624 (6th Cir. 1967).

376 F.2d 414 (James Blaine Gillespie v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry William Theriault v. State of Mississippi
390 F.2d 657 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)