James Betesh Import Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

James Betesh Import Co. v. United States

55 Cust. Ct. 400, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1756

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 26, 1965

DocketNo. 69473; protests 59/13703, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 55 Cust. Ct. 400 (James Betesh Import Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Betesh Import Co. v. United States, 55 Cust. Ct. 400, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1756 (cusc 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “T” consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), and that the items marked “D” consist of cups and saucers the same as those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “T” consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), and that the items marked “D” consist of cups and saucers the same as those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 Cust. Ct. 400, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-betesh-import-co-v-united-states-cusc-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack