James Bell McCoy v. Craig Watkins

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 13, 2014·No. 05-14-00844-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered October 13, 2014

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00844-CV

JAMES BELL MCCOY, Appellant

V.

CRAIG WATKINS, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-13955-B

ORDER Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Brown

In response to this Court’s letter questioning its jurisdiction over the appeal because

appellant’s claims against Bill Hill, an unserved defendant, appeared to remain pending,

appellant filed a jurisdictional brief. The Court has reviewed appellant’s jurisdictional brief and

his amended notice of appeal. Appellant has indicated that he does not expect that Bill Hill will

ever be served. Accordingly, the case stands as if there has been a discontinuance as to Bill Hill,

and the judgment is regarded as final for purposes of appeal. See Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.

v. Penn, 363 S.W.2d 230, 232 (Tex. 1962).

Appellant’s brief is due thirty days from the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Bell McCoy v. Craig Watkins, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

James Bell McCoy v. Craig Watkins (James Bell McCoy v. Craig Watkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Penn
363 S.W.2d 230 (Texas Supreme Court, 1962)