James Baugh and Mrs. William Edward Baugh v. Richard Taulbee, by Ella Jean Taulbee, Mother as Next Friend

Sixth Circuit

James Baugh and Mrs. William Edward Baugh v. Richard Taulbee, by Ella Jean Taulbee, Mother as Next Friend

212 F.2d 794, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3443

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 17, 1954

Docket11946

StatusPublished

This text of 212 F.2d 794 (James Baugh and Mrs. William Edward Baugh v. Richard Taulbee, by Ella Jean Taulbee, Mother as Next Friend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Baugh and Mrs. William Edward Baugh v. Richard Taulbee, by Ella Jean Taulbee, Mother as Next Friend, 212 F.2d 794, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3443 (6th Cir. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon this appeal from a jury verdict and judgment thereon assessing damages against the appellants for injuries received by the appellee in an automobile collision caused by the negligence of James Baugh, the court has given careful consideration to the portions of the record here presented, the briefs and oral arguments of the parties.

The principal contention of the appellants is that the court withdrew from the jury the issue of negligence, on the ground that uncontradicted facts disclosed that the appellants were guilty of negligence as a matter of law, and submitted the cause to the jury upon the question of damages alone. Our study of the record brings us to the view that there was no error in this instruction to the jury. We also find no prejudicial error in other respects that were saved for review by timely objection or obvious on the face of the record. Wherefore, the judgment below is .

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon this appeal from a jury verdict and judgment thereon assessing damages against the appellants for injuries received by the appellee in an automobile collision caused by the negligence of James Baugh, the court has given careful consideration to the portions of the record here presented, the briefs and oral arguments of the parties.

The principal contention of the appellants is that the court withdrew from the jury the issue of negligence, on the ground that uncontradicted facts disclosed that the appellants were guilty of negligence as a matter of law, and submitted the cause to the jury upon the question of damages alone. Our study of the record brings us to the view that there was no error in this instruction to the jury. We also find no prejudicial error in other respects that were saved for review by timely objection or obvious on the face of the record. Wherefore, the judgment below is .

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 F.2d 794, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-baugh-and-mrs-william-edward-baugh-v-richard-taulbee-by-ella-jean-ca6-1954.