James Bates v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 2, 2022
Docket07-22-00275-CR
StatusPublished

This text of James Bates v. the State of Texas (James Bates v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Bates v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-22-00275-CR

JAMES BATES, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 137th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021-423,086, Honorable John J. “Trey” McClendon III, Presiding

November 2, 2022 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.

Appellant, James Bates, appeals his conviction for continuous sexual abuse of a

child1 and sentence to fifty years’ confinement. We dismiss the untimely appeal for want

of jurisdiction and because Appellant has no right of appeal.

The timely filing of a written notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to

hearing an appeal. Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). In a

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 21.02. criminal case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is

imposed or suspended or within ninety days if the defendant timely files a motion for new

trial. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). If a notice of appeal is not timely filed, an appellate court

has no option but to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Castillo, 369 S.W.3d at

198.

The trial court sentenced Appellant on October 15, 2021. Because no motion for

new trial was filed, a notice of appeal was due within thirty days after sentencing, by

November 15, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 26.2(a). Appellant filed a notice of appeal

on September 30, 2022. Thus, Appellant’s untimely notice of appeal prevents this Court

from acquiring jurisdiction over the appeal.

Further, under Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), we are required to dismiss an

appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been

made part of the record.” Here, the trial court’s certification of Appellant’s right of appeal

indicates that this is a plea-bargain case with no right of appeal and that Appellant has

waived the right of appeal. The certification comports with the record before the Court.

By letter of October 4, 2022, we notified Appellant of the consequences of his late

notice of appeal and the trial court’s certification and directed him to show how the Court

has jurisdiction over the appeal by October 14. Appellant has not filed a response or had

any further communication with this Court to date.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction and based on the trial

court’s certification.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Castillo, Ex Parte Mario Amaro
369 S.W.3d 196 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James Bates v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-bates-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.