James Barclay & Co. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 546
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJune 14, 1961
DocketNo. 65819; protests 164541-K/2905, etc. (Chicago)
StatusPublished

This text of 46 Cust. Ct. 546 (James Barclay & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Barclay & Co. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 546 (cusc 1961).

Opinion

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. R. C. Williams & Co., Inc. (40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. R. C. Williams & Co.
40 C.C.P.A. 130 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1953)
Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 33 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 Cust. Ct. 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-barclay-co-v-united-states-cusc-1961.