James Barclay & Co. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 394
United States Customs Court·Decided October 11, 1956·No. No. 60283; protests 276200-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
[395]*395Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. R. C. Williams & Co., Inc. (40 C. C. P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508) and Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James Barclay & Co. v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 394 (cusc 1956).
37 Cust. Ct. 394 (James Barclay & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 33 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)