James B. Pardue v. Anthony J. Principi

Veterans Claims

James B. Pardue v. Anthony J. Principi

17 Vet. App. 547, 2004 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 187, 2004 WL 784289

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims·Decided April 13, 2004·No. 03-505·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On March 18, 2003, the appellant, through counsel, appealed the November 20, 2002, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. On April 5, 2004, the parties filed a joint motion to terminate this appeal on terms set forth in a settlement agreement between the parties to be effective when the Court acts to terminate this appeal. See U.S. Vet.App. R. 42. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the appeal is terminated. Under Rule 41(b) of the Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, this order is the final judgment and mandate of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On March 18, 2003, the appellant, through counsel, appealed the November 20, 2002, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. On April 5, 2004, the parties filed a joint motion to terminate this appeal on terms set forth in a settlement agreement between the parties to be effective when the Court acts to terminate this appeal. See U.S. Vet.App. R. 42. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the appeal is terminated. Under Rule 41(b) of the Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, this order is the final judgment and mandate of the Court.

James B. Pardue v. Anthony J. Principi, 17 Vet. App. 547, 2004 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 187, 2004 WL 784289 (Cal. 2004).

Pincite

17 Vet. App. 547 (James B. Pardue v. Anthony J. Principi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.