James B. Packard v. United States

339 F.2d 887

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 22, 1964·No. 19318·Published

Opinion

339 F.2d 887

James B. PACKARD, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 19318.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 22, 1964.

Irving C. Sugarman, Bernheim, Sugarman & Gilbert, Richmond, Cal., for appellant.

Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., David R. Urdan, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before ORR, HAMLEY and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the trial court. (United States v. Packard, D.C., 236 F.Supp. 585).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

339 F.2d 887

James B. PACKARD, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 19318.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 22, 1964.

Irving C. Sugarman, Bernheim, Sugarman & Gilbert, Richmond, Cal., for appellant.

Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., David R. Urdan, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before ORR, HAMLEY and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the trial court. (United States v. Packard, D.C., 236 F.Supp. 585).

James B. Packard v. United States, 339 F.2d 887 (9th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

339 F.2d 887 (James B. Packard v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.