James B. Packard v. United States
This text of 339 F.2d 887 (James B. Packard v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
339 F.2d 887
James B. PACKARD, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 19318.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 22, 1964.
Irving C. Sugarman, Bernheim, Sugarman & Gilbert, Richmond, Cal., for appellant.
Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., David R. Urdan, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before ORR, HAMLEY and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the trial court. (United States v. Packard, D.C., 236 F.Supp. 585).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
339 F.2d 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-b-packard-v-united-states-ca9-1964.