James B. Davis v. Marilyn Bryan
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00306-CV ____________________
JAMES B. DAVIS, Appellant
V.
MARILYN BRYAN, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 15-11-11701-CV ________________________________________________________ _____________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On August 15, 2018, we notified the parties that the notice of appeal did not
appear to have been timely filed. The appellant, James B. Davis, did not file a
response.
The trial court signed the judgment on March 7, 2018. By filing a motion for
new trial within thirty days of the date of the judgment, Davis extended the time for
perfecting his appeal to June 5, 2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(1). Davis filed a
notice of appeal on August 10, 2018, but by that date his notice was untimely and
1 outside the period for which we may extend the applicable appellate deadline. See
Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(1), 26.3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
________________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN Chief Justice
Submitted on September 26, 2018 Opinion Delivered September 27, 2018
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James B. Davis v. Marilyn Bryan (James B. Davis v. Marilyn Bryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.