James Autler Co. v. Rankin
This text of 112 N.Y.S. 1085 (James Autler Co. v. Rankin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff sues the defendant, who is a common carrier, for the value of certain goods alleged to have been delivered to him, and by him lost. The plaintiff’s secretary testified that tie prepared goods for transfer to be sent to Krause & Co., and as to the value of these goods. The man in charge of the elevator in the building where the plaintiff had its place of business testified that he knew the defendant’s truck and some of his drivers, that the truck came to the building every day, and that on March 23, 1907, he gave a package to one of ttie defendant’s drivers which he had taken from the office of the plaintiff. No receipt was taken for the package. This witness admitted that he did not remember the particular date upon which he delivered the package until the secretary of the "plaintiff, a few days before the trial, had told him the date of shipment. This evidence was insufficient to show that the defendant or any of his agents received the package which the plaintiff prepared for transfer. Nor is there any evidence in the record to show that the goods were not delivered to the consignee.
The judgment is reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 N.Y.S. 1085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-autler-co-v-rankin-nyappterm-1908.