James Arthur Shane III v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 26, 2015·No. 09-14-00449-CR·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _____________________ _____

09-14-00449-CR

James Arthur Shane III, Appellant V.

The State of Texas, Appellee

On Appeal from the 410th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 14-05-05425 CR (Count 3)

ORDER

Appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel certified that counsel provided copies of the motion and brief to Appellant, advised Appellant of Appellant’s right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied Appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Appellant requested access to the appellate record with this Court. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide access to a paper copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on or before Friday, April 24, 2015. See id., 436 S.W.3d at 321-22.

ORDER ENTERED March 26, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Arthur Shane III v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

James Arthur Shane III v. State (James Arthur Shane III v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)