James Arthur Jackson v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden
415 F.2d 478
This text of 415 F.2d 478 (James Arthur Jackson v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
James Arthur Jackson v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, 415 F.2d 478 (9th Cir. 1969).
Opinion
The order of the District Court denying petition for writ of habeas corpus is set aside. Jackson v. Oliver, 391 U.S. 602, 88 S.Ct. 1866, 20 L.Ed.2d 846 (1968); Peyton v. Rowe, 391 U.S. 54, 88 S.Ct. 1549, 20 L.Ed.2d 426 (1968).
The matter is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Peyton v. Rowe
391 U.S. 54 (Supreme Court, 1968)
Skolnick v. Moses
391 U.S. 600 (Supreme Court, 1968)
Jackson v. Oliver
391 U.S. 602 (Supreme Court, 1968)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
415 F.2d 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-arthur-jackson-v-robert-a-heinze-warden-ca9-1969.