James Arnaz Randle v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 24, 2021·No. 05-20-00290-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered February 24, 2021

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00290-CR No. 05-20-00292-CR

JAMES ARNAZ RANDLE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F17-30614-P & F17-30615-P

ORDER

The Court DENIES appellant’s February 22, 2021 pro se motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellant is represented by appointed counsel and is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981); see also Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Appellant’s brief has been filed. The State’s brief is due by March 24, 2021. /s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Arnaz Randle v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

James Arnaz Randle v. State (James Arnaz Randle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudd v. State
616 S.W.2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)
Bledsoe v. State
178 S.W.3d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)