James Andrew Wiley v. United States

Fifth Circuit

James Andrew Wiley v. United States

389 F.2d 479

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 29, 1967

Docket24285_1

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 389 F.2d 479 (James Andrew Wiley v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Andrew Wiley v. United States, 389 F.2d 479 (5th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully considered the record in this appeal from a conviction on a four-count indictment charging the appellant with possessing and selling non-taxpaid liquor and carrying on the business of retail liquor dealer without payment of the special tax. We conclude that there is no merit in the contentions that there was an adequate ground of defense by entrapment, or that the conduct of the undercover agents violated the constitutional prohibitions against unreasonable search and seizure. See Hoffa v. United States, 385 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 408, 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966), and Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206, 87 S.Ct. 424, 17 L.Ed.2d 312 (1966).

It appearing that there was no error in the conduct of the trial, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully considered the record in this appeal from a conviction on a four-count indictment charging the appellant with possessing and selling non-taxpaid liquor and carrying on the business of retail liquor dealer without payment of the special tax. We conclude that there is no merit in the contentions that there was an adequate ground of defense by entrapment, or that the conduct of the undercover agents violated the constitutional prohibitions against unreasonable search and seizure. See Hoffa v. United States, 385 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 408, 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966), and Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206, 87 S.Ct. 424, 17 L.Ed.2d 312 (1966).

It appearing that there was no error in the conduct of the trial, the judgment is affirmed.

Radio Corporation of America v. Association of Scientists and Professional Engineering Personnel Associationof Scientists and Professional Engineering Personnel Camden Area Chapter Henryj. Andreas and John P. Moran, Association of Scientists and Professional Engineering Personnel v. Radio Corporation of America. Association of Scientists and Professionalengineering Personnel v. Radio Corporation of America

414 F.2d 893 (Third Circuit, 1969)

Radio Corp. of America v. Ass'n of Scientists & Professional Engineering Personnel

414 F.2d 893 (Third Circuit, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

389 F.2d 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-andrew-wiley-v-united-states-ca5-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack