James Andrew Times v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida

482 F.2d 935, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8479
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 3, 1973
Docket73-1761
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 482 F.2d 935 (James Andrew Times v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Andrew Times v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, 482 F.2d 935, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8479 (5th Cir. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the dismissal of Appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus concerning his conviction for second degree murder in a Florida state court. We are in agreement with the District Judge that Appellant’s challenge to the prosecutor’s question regarding Appellant’s conviction for aggravated assault does not raise an issue cognizable in this federal habeas corpus proceeding. See 28 U.S. C.A. § 2241. We also agree that the *936 prosecutor’s question to Appellant during cross-examination concerning Appellant’s refusal to answer questions posed by a detective was an isolated remark cured by the trial Judge and constituted harmless constitutional error in view of the overwhelming evidence of guilt presented. See Chapman v. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705.

We finally note that Appellant’s claim that he was deprived of his rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments since he was not offered the benefit of or represented by counsel during his 1958 trial for aggravated assault which was mentioned before the jury during the course of his recent trial also presents an instance of harmless constitutional error.

The order dismissing the petition for the writ of habeas corpus is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tolbert Dickson v. Louie L. Wainwright
683 F.2d 348 (Eleventh Circuit, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
482 F.2d 935, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-andrew-times-v-louie-l-wainwright-director-division-of-ca5-1973.