James Anderson v. Judy Langley

62 F. App'x 749
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 12, 2003
Docket02-4112
StatusUnpublished

This text of 62 F. App'x 749 (James Anderson v. Judy Langley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Anderson v. Judy Langley, 62 F. App'x 749 (8th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate James Kenneth Anderson appeals the district court’s 1 preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We grant Anderson’s motion to appeal in forma pauperis, and we leave to the district court the details of calculating the initial partial appellate filing fee, and the collection of the balance of the appellate filing fee in installments. See Henderson v. Norris, 129 F.3d 481, 484-85 (8th Cir.1997) (per curiam).

Having carefully reviewed the record, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (de novo standard of review), we summarily affirm the dismissal of the action. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

A true copy.

1

. The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Bobby E. Shepherd, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 F. App'x 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-anderson-v-judy-langley-ca8-2003.