James Allen v. State of Alabama

735 F.2d 1276, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21286
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 21, 1984·No. 82-7290·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

Respondent’s motion to revise our order, 732 F.2d 858, denying rehearing in this case is GRANTED. The language in the second paragraph, “[w]e held that petitioner was entitled to the out-of-time appeal and, because he is indigent, to a transcript of his trial as an incident thereto,” is deleted and the following is inserted in lieu thereof:

We held that petitioner was entitled to an evidentiary hearing to determine whether he had voluntarily and knowingly waived his right to appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Allen v. State of Alabama, 735 F.2d 1276, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21286 (11th Cir. 1984).

735 F.2d 1276 (James Allen v. State of Alabama) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related